Scientific Reach
Scientific Reach
  • Home
    • Blog
    • How We Work
  • About
  • Who We Are
  • Courses
    • Writing >
      • Journal Papers
      • Grant Papers
    • Presenting >
      • Oral Presentations
      • Poster Presentations
    • Advanced Powerpoint Techniques
    • Broadcasting >
      • Science and the Media
      • Networking for Scientists
  • Think Reader
  • Contact

Scientific Communication Blog

Trap 2 - Cold, audiences do not answer questions

11/24/2014

0 Comments

 
PictureSource Flickr. Author Jestqit
Do you have someone work the audience before your appearance on stage, as is the case for famous singers preceded by less known groups getting the audience into shape? Some university dean, or Nobel Prize winner celebrating your multiple journal citations, your incredible academic record, your long list of patents? If not, your audience is still cold when you appear behind the lectern. And this is why what the pundits recommend does not work: “Start with a question”, “Interact with the audience”, they say. And out on a limb they go, the misfortunate presenters for whom good advice but poor timing and unreasonable expectation garner nothing but the awkward silence of a reluctant audience.

Sometimes, the question is wrong. I recall the young scientist whose work featured the discovery of a gene associated with breast cancer. After introducing himself at the beginning of his talk, he probed the audience with this memorable question: “Has anyone had a family member die of breast cancer?”
Naturally, the long silence that followed was not an indication that the audience was made of healthy individuals whose parents were healthy and grandparents were still in their prime. The presenter must have felt like someone listening to the SETI space probe waiting for a signal betraying intelligent life in the universe, for there seemed to be no life at all in this audience. The question was too personal and too risky: imagine someone had replied: “Yes. My mother died of breast cancer last week.” What would the presenter have responded?

But most of all, the timing is wrong. At the beginning of a talk, the audience does not readily open up to someone they do not know. It adopts a wait-and-see attitude. The positively-charged presenter must create a low resistance channel to reach the neutral audience. And I know no better way to do that than by smiling and welcoming the audience. The presenter must also establish a potential difference (voltage) between him/her and the audience – for example, by creating a curiosity gap that the audience eagerly wants filled. The question is a good way to build that curiosity gap, particularly an intriguing, provocative question or statement like Friedman’s assertion that “the world is flat”. But that question must be rhetorical.

There is no need to force the audience into action at the beginning of your scientific talk. An audience that has had time to be interested in both the presenter and his/her topic is easier to interact with and engage.

By Jean-Luc Lebrun

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    After running a research center for Apple, I now write books on scientific writing and scientific presentations. I also conduct seminars to help scientists in life science and engineering science effectively promote their work. The way one promotes one's scientific achievements today, has evolved much since I started teaching 20 years ago. 

    Archives

    June 2019
    February 2019
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    November 2014

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

    View my profile on LinkedIn

Scientific Reach

Home
Blog
Contact
About